BestCarAudio.com

Showcasing the Best in the Mobile Enhancement Industry

Showcasing the Best in the Mobile Enhancement Industry
  • Upgrades
    • Motorcycle Audio
  • Articles
    • Bluetooth
    • Car Audio
    • Motorcycle Audio
    • Navigation
    • Remote Starter
    • Satellite Radio
    • Smartphone Integration
    • Test Drive Product Reviews
    • Vehicle Insights
  • Profiles
    • Installation Profiles
    • Installer Profiles
    • Retailer Profiles
    • Vendor Profiles
  • Products
  • Dealer Locator
  • Contact
  • Shop
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • 0 items
Home » ARTICLES » More Confusion with Subwoofer Enclosure Response Simulations
Sony Ad

More Confusion with Subwoofer Enclosure Response Simulations

May 17, 2023 By Dave MacKinnon

Enclosure Simulation

As happens frequently, a friend tagged me in a social media post about someone comparing two subwoofers using free enclosure simulation software. This person had spent significant time modeling different drivers in different air volumes and tuning frequencies to devise a solution for their vehicle. Unfortunately, aside from not considering how the vehicle would affect the subwoofer’s response, they’d also made a grave error based on the graphs they were looking at. Let me explain what happened.

Subwoofer Frequency Response Simulations

We should start by looking at what enclosure simulation software does. All speakers act like springs. The voice coil pushes the speaker forward, then the spider and surround pull the speaker back to rest. If the speaker is in an enclosure, the air inside that enclosure contributes to the spring, limiting how far the speaker moves for a given force from the voice coil. The contribution of the air in the enclosure can be beneficial and detrimental, even simultaneously! For example, a small amount of air in the enclosure acts like a tight spring, dramatically limiting how far the cone moves. Since speakers need to move much more to reproduce low-frequency information, the enclosure acts like a high-pass filter. The “tight spring” effect can also increase output from the speaker. Though it’s mostly distortion, the speaker cone continues to move after the signal goes away. This added cone movement adds acoustic output. Sadly, it’s not audio content that was in the original recording.

Enclosure Simulation
A simulation of an 8-inch subwoofer in three sealed enclosures of different sizes.

The graph above shows the predicted frequency response of an 8-inch subwoofer in three different enclosures. The yellow trace indicates the subwoofer’s output when it’s in an enclosure with 0.3 cubic foot of airspace. The teal trace is the predicted output when the subwoofer is in 0.1 cubic foot of space. Finally, the violet trace is the expected output when the sub has 1.0 cubic foot of air behind it. Of course, the three enclosures would sound very different, and the driver would have different power handling limits in each application.

Normalized Response Curves

When designing speaker enclosures, a half-dozen characteristics must be balanced to determine what is right for a specific application. In the case of the discussion I was asked to comment on, the person doing the simulations chose a particular driver and enclosure design based on the predicted output of the system. Unfortunately, he was looking at the wrong type of graph and chose incorrectly based on his goals.

Speaker enclosure simulation software provides graphs in two common ways: They show either normalized response or amplitude/acoustic/SPL response. The shape of the curves in both graphs will be the same for each simulation. However, the amplitude of multiple simulations will vary based on the physical characteristics of the drivers being modeled. I’ve created a comparison to show how the information is easily misinterpreted.

In a normalized response graph, simulation software will show you the gain or loss in output based on the enclosure and perhaps the inductive effects of the voice coil relative to what the speaker would produce based purely on a calculated efficiency. I know that was a mouthful. So let’s look at a graph to understand this a bit better.

Enclosure Simulation
A frequency response graph that is shown in reference to the calculated efficiency of a subwoofer.

The graph shows us several pieces of information. First and foremost, the shape of the red trace indicates how loud the subwoofer is at different frequencies ranging from 8 hertz to 2 kHz, assuming it’s provided the same voltage at each frequency. If you have any filters or equalization applied, the predicted output will vary. Second, the graph shows us that this enclosure design has increased the driver’s efficiency over its calculated level from about 45 hertz to 160 hertz. This design adds 1.13 dB of output at 83 hertz. Next, we can see that the system’s output decreases quickly and dramatically below the enclosure tuning frequency of 22 hertz. Typically, when modeling subwoofers, we look at the -3 dB frequency and the 10 dB level to understand how much deep bass will be produced. This enclosure has a -3 dB frequency at 22 Hz and is down 10 dB at 17 hertz.

Now, let’s make a comparison. I’ve added a second trace to the graph. It’s a very different subwoofer than what created the red trace.

Enclosure Simulation
I’ve added a second subwoofer to the simulation. Its predicted frequency response is shown in yellow.

Looking at this graph, we can see that the software predicts that the second subwoofer will be more efficient at almost all frequencies under 100 hertz. The difference is about 1 dB SPL at 25 hertz, so the difference isn’t drastic. However, because we are looking at a normalized graph and not an amplitude response graph, the statement that the second subwoofer is louder is actually completely incorrect.

As I mentioned, these normalized graphs show the enclosure’s effect on the driver’s output relative to its calculated efficiency. For example, the subwoofer represented by the red trace has an efficiency of 87.34 dB SPL @ 1W/1M. The subwoofer represented by the yellow trace has a calculated efficiency of 85.72 dB SPL. The gains and losses shown on the graph are relative to those efficiency numbers. To decide which is louder, we must simulate power going to each subwoofer.

SPL Response Graphs

Let’s tell the software we will provide each subwoofer with 100 watts of power, then ask it to predict the output.

Enclosure Simulation
This graph shows the drivers’ output for a given amount of power from an amplifier.

We can see that the shape of each trace is the same, but the red trace is now above the yellow almost everywhere above 22 hertz. This change makes sense, as the subwoofer represented by the red trace is several decibels more efficient. This also stands to reason, as the subwoofer represented by the red trace is a 16-inch driver, and the yellow one is a 12-inch.

Power Not Voltage

One other consideration: Many engineers who develop speakers work with voltages rather than power. The behind-the-scenes calculations that create the graphs are all based on voltages. If the software you’re looking at uses voltages, the impedance of the drivers matters a great deal. Applying 2 volts to a 1-ohm subwoofer results in 4 watts driving the subwoofer. Only 1 watt is produced if we use 2 volts to a 4-ohm subwoofer. Making observations without taking power rather than voltage into account can skew the perceived results significantly.

Leave the Subwoofer Enclosure Designs to the Experts

If you want a subwoofer enclosure designed for your vehicle, visit a specialty mobile enhancement retailer near you. They can provide you with a bass solution that will look and sound great and blend nicely with your vehicle’s interior. If they show you any response graphs, make sure you’re looking at the correct type of graph before making decisions based on output capability.

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • Email

Related

Filed Under: ARTICLES, Car Audio Tagged With: Speakers, SPL, Subwoofer Enclosures, Subwoofers

About Dave MacKinnon

Dave has worked in the mobile electronics industry since 1988 in almost every capacity, including roles as a Retail Salesperson, Installer, Sales Representative, Technical Trainer, and Product Development Manager for some of the largest car audio companies in the world. Dave started his writing career in 2000 as the Technical Editor of a Toronto-based car audio magazine and has reviewed more than 450 products. Formally trained as an Electronics Technician, Dave is considered an industry expert when it comes to explaining how mobile audio components work and has crafted thousands of articles to share that knowledge. He’s currently the Head Writer for 1sixty8 media and the Editor-in-Chief at BestCarAudio.com

Audison Forza

Save Time and Money!

Our buying guides will help you make educated decisions when upgrading your vehicle. Click the image above to shop our affordable and informative buying guides.

Industry Profiles

Hilux Stereo

Mobile Enhancement Installation Profile: Xtreme Autosound & Marine Toyota Hilux

March 15, 2023 By Dave MacKinnon 

Matthew Crouch of Shelbyville, Kentucky, owns the ultra-clean 1991 Toyota Hilux you see above. Matthew is one of the … [Read More...]

Jeep Grand Cherokee

Mobile Enhancement Installation Profile: KarTele Jeep Grand Cherokee

February 13, 2023 By Dave MacKinnon 

A demo vehicle is one of the best tools available to demonstrate the audio and convenience upgrade options for a car or … [Read More...]

Press Releases

RDVFL Mighty Mount Press Release
RDV Becomes Exclusive US Distributor for Mighty Mount
New Heise Connect App Goes Live for Smart Devices
RDVFL CarPlay CP1
RDV Releases New CarPlay Hardware Platform
Maserati Radio
RDV Launches Tesla Style Radio for Maserati
Firstech Launches Momento M7 Three-Channel Car Dash Camera

Vehicle Insights

2023 Lexus ES300h F Sport

2023 Lexus ES300h F Sport. Smooth with a Touch of Sport.

2023 Mazda CX-9

2023 Mazda CX-9. Leaving Smoothly.

Find Facility Near You

Subscribe to BestCarAudio via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to BestCarAudio.com and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Popular Categories

  • Car Audio
  • Window Tint
  • Remote Car Starters
  • Vehicle Insights
  • Radar Detectors

Supporting Manufacturers

  • Arc Audio
  • Compustar
  • Hertz
  • Momento
  • Rockford Fosgate
  • Sony

Contact

  • Editorial
  • General
  • Advertise
  • Dealer Locator Guidelines

Forms

  • Profile Request

Sign up for our newsletter today. Opt out at any time with 1 click.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

BestCarAudio.com is a product of 1sixty8 media, inc. · Copyright © 2023 1sixty8 media, inc. · Privacy Policy · Website by 1sixty8 media, inc. · Log in

 

Loading Comments...
 

    x
    x